PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.11%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 15.23%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.43%
Less D&A growth vs. TSM's 22.30%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
247.68%
Deferred tax of 247.68% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.88%
SBC growth of 5.88% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
37.81%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -251.41%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
58.62%
AR growth while TSM is negative at -117.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
62.52%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -92.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-111.56%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -91.43%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
24.60%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -105.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-17.20%
Negative yoy while TSM is 67.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
68.26%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.62%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
55.10%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 33.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.83%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 100.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-70.35%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -91.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 93.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-126.32%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.04%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.