PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.58%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.58%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-11.84%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.55%
SBC growth of 5.55% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
359.79%
Well above TSM's 113.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.43%
AR growth well above TSM's 97.31%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-195.87%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 92.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1035.24%
AP growth well above TSM's 129.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
594.86%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. TSM's 3150.53%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
213.68%
Well above TSM's 125.93%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
146.87%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 68.41%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-73.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -10.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
244.54%
Acquisition spending well above TSM's 49.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-239.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -2310638.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
66.89%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -91.02%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-150.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -47.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-486.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -24.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.99%
Debt repayment growth of 63.99% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.