PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TSM at -1.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.45%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -1.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
185.58%
Deferred tax of 185.58% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-1.89%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-160.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TSM is 155.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
33.41%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. TSM's 2288.21%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
24.55%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TSM's 268.85%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-182.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -383.47%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-182.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -110.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-253.77%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -208.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-62.31%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
56.21%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 7.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -62.21%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
39.14%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -108.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
15.19%
Below 50% of TSM's 1796.43%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
934.48%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -43.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
69.96%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -3.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-222.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -66696573.08%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1240.34%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.