PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.26%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 11.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.95%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -1.54%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-21.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.15%
SBC growth of 8.15% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-72.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -54.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-362.93%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -110.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
208.95%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -196.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-227.74%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 138.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
59.55%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. TSM's 1394.01%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
296.91%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -1911.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-36.25%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -28.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.50%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -8.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 68.64%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-5.50%
We reduce yoy sales while TSM is 6002.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-101.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 31.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
80.94%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 92.81%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.71%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 24.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.