PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.66%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -3.24%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.75%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-13.80%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.50%
SBC growth of 2.50% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
253.87%
Well above TSM's 221.40% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
196.15%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. TSM's 795.68%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-268.49%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -258.94%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-149.98%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 127.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
452.03%
Growth well above TSM's 111.43%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
49.95%
Well above TSM's 78.97%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
105.33%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 22.46%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
21.88%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -20.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -228.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-4.07%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -61.48%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-114700.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -33.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1940.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -84.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.71%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 90.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Buyback growth of 98.84% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.