PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.62%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TSM at -10.46%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.08%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -0.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
36.67%
Deferred tax of 36.67% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.96%
SBC growth of 5.96% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-115.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -136.83%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-79.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -214.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
159.91%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TSM's 609.09%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-82.45%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -99.10%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-110.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -208.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-19.77%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -1.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-44.44%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -16.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
3.37%
Lower CapEx growth vs. TSM's 54.56%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
136.96%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -21.86%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
99.65%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -70.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
26.14%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 45.30%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-32.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -56.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-1372.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.