PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-80.60%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 29.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.26%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with TSM at -1.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
32.14%
Deferred tax of 32.14% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.67%
SBC growth of 6.67% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -204.10%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-427.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -33.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-106.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -135.31%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
180.60%
Lower AP growth vs. TSM's 92243.80%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while TSM is 524.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
760.00%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -1008.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-33.74%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -12.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
20.00%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -92.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.12%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -21.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-21.07%
We reduce yoy sales while TSM is 15.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
2500.00%
Growth well above TSM's 169.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
205.11%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -71.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-652.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.