PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.08%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -11.97%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.44%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -3.62%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
24.24%
Deferred tax of 24.24% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.43%
SBC growth of 9.43% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-1050.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -102.86%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-611.76%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -116.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-652.17%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -522.31%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
209.38%
AP growth well above TSM's 153.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-3.57%
Negative yoy usage while TSM is 975.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-166.67%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -340.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-40.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -35.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
41.82%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -2.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.71%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 9.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-0.14%
We reduce yoy sales while TSM is 53.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
250.00%
Growth well above TSM's 96.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-252.84%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.20%
Buyback growth of 98.20% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.