PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
122.53%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 16.72%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.13%
Less D&A growth vs. TSM's 22.71%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.61%
Deferred tax of 75.61% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
12.07%
SBC growth of 12.07% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-63.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -7983.95%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-57.02%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -212.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-23.62%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -21.30%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-12.12%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 75.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-36.21%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -175.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
712.50%
Well above TSM's 33.65%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
148.91%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 12.94%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-18.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 40.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Purchases well above TSM's 20.33%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-22.62%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -62.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-83.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 115.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-21.56%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 33.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-44400.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -66548.69%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.