PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.19%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -12.36%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.26%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -0.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
322.73%
Deferred tax of 322.73% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
7.89%
SBC growth of 7.89% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
71.87%
Well above TSM's 115.94% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-58.00%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 35.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-25.93%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -22.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
152.63%
Lower AP growth vs. TSM's 311.03%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
212.35%
Growth well above TSM's 36.26%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-66.67%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -734.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
150.00%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -19.26%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 425.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
73.17%
Purchases well above TSM's 5.68%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-61.48%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -4.44%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
6420.00%
Growth well above TSM's 35.47%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-65.25%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 18.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
77.52%
Debt repayment above 1.5x TSM's 51.05%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.95%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.