PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
43.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 12.91%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.49%
SBC growth of 30.49% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
204.55%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -6675.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
118.99%
AR growth while TSM is negative at -334.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-2.94%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 54.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
28.57%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -136.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-83.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -385.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-14.29%
Negative yoy while TSM is 86.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
64.11%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -27.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -17.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -7.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
11.62%
Below 50% of TSM's 29.50%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
12.34%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. TSM's 97.35%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
9.16%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -5.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
54.41%
Debt repayment above 1.5x TSM's 5.24%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.08%
Buyback growth of 80.08% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.