PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.50%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 18.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.51%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -3.22%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
21.57%
Deferred tax of 21.57% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.10%
SBC growth of 3.10% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-1428.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -80.54%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-889.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -155.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-14550.00%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 108.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
581.82%
AP growth well above TSM's 172.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
250.96%
Growth well above TSM's 467.48%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-75.00%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -988.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-36.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -22.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -49.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -82.34%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
915.44%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x TSM's 44.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
80.31%
Growth well above TSM's 4.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
77.33%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -78.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to TSM's 99.24%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.92%
Buyback growth of 89.92% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.