PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.72%
Net income growth under 50% of TSM's 39.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.25%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -11.05%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-233.87%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.76%
SBC growth of 3.76% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-99.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -1858.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-26.02%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -167.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-10.92%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 2462.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-65.33%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -26.20%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-114.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -336.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
7.14%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TSM's 97.35%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-46.66%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 20.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 16.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.38%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -60.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
21.18%
Below 50% of TSM's 45.97%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
154.59%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -23.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
127.20%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 5.60%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-203.03%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.