PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.39%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
16.67%
D&A growth well above TSM's 1.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
87.83%
Deferred tax of 87.83% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
13.38%
SBC growth well above TSM's 1.15%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-77.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -70.35%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-77.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -139.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
198.08%
Inventory growth well above TSM's 171.86%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
65.74%
AP growth well above TSM's 81.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-164.16%
Negative yoy usage while TSM is 29.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
80.00%
Well above TSM's 72.75%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.82%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
36.95%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -13.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.96%
Purchases well above TSM's 0.55%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
75.53%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x TSM's 1.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
567.90%
Growth well above TSM's 408.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
3637.50%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -10.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x TSM's 51.41%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.86%
Buyback growth of 70.86% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.