PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 3.22%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.10%
Less D&A growth vs. TSM's 3.39%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
135.71%
Deferred tax of 135.71% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
25.28%
SBC growth well above TSM's 12.77%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-50.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -75.39%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-275.27%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 68.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
47.06%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -259.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
163.41%
AP growth well above TSM's 38.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
159.46%
Growth well above TSM's 13.18%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
250.00%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -845.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
30.00%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -16.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
11.72%
Lower CapEx growth vs. TSM's 30.54%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -19.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
100.40%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x TSM's 20.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
125.39%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -220.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
137.12%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 31.35%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.30%
Buyback growth of 76.30% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.