PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.17%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TSM at -3.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
277.57%
D&A growth well above TSM's 2.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-600.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
66.96%
SBC growth well above TSM's 2.70%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
171.31%
Well above TSM's 64.80% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
117.67%
AR growth well above TSM's 50.08%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
135.76%
Inventory growth well above TSM's 7.80%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-111.27%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 231.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
653.33%
Growth well above TSM's 496.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-325.00%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -707.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
72.39%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -17.72%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-40.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 31.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-20891.18%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 510.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-756.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
128900.00%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -8.98%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-608.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -323.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1178.67%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 30.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.84%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x TSM's 85.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.