PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
114.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 16.39%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-25.99%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
33.75%
Deferred tax of 33.75% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.41%
Less SBC growth vs. TSM's 48.97%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-368.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TSM is 1033.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1152.27%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 17.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-272.22%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 25.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
2912.50%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -34.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-315.06%
Negative yoy usage while TSM is 1344.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
122.22%
Well above TSM's 47.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-18.38%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 70.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-117.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -10.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.04%
Some acquisitions while TSM is negative at -100.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
38.72%
Purchases well above TSM's 40.67%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
239.22%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -28.51%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
97.15%
Growth well above TSM's 187.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
85.17%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -4.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while TSM is negative at -6851.66%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.