PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.16%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 17.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
1.78%
D&A growth well above TSM's 1.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-870.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.39%
Less SBC growth vs. TSM's 316.52%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
56.45%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -33.03%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
5.38%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. TSM's 42.62%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
22.64%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -146.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
198.57%
Lower AP growth vs. TSM's 585.28%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
316.67%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
113.97%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -7020.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
43.12%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -8.95%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
38.59%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 15.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-350.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 128.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-7.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -16.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-30.02%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -77.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
350.00%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -1081.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 4.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.41%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.27%
Buyback growth below 50% of TSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.