PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.48%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -5.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-9.86%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 6.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-75.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.54%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 42.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
213.89%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -25.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-123.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -100.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
180.17%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -245.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
105.70%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -91.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
446.23%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. TSM's 1235.28%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-166.67%
Negative yoy while TSM is 1569.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
29.44%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 14.11%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
51.28%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -7.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-207.79%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 134.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-31.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -4.03%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-187.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -98.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-20925.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -29.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1086.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -73.79%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.20%
Buyback growth of 58.20% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.