PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
202.89%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 35.85%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.95%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
34.27%
Deferred tax of 34.27% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
14.56%
Less SBC growth vs. TSM's 91.70%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-119.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -56.22%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1085.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -16785.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-47.88%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 66.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
6972.73%
AP growth well above TSM's 1899.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
200.52%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -55.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-530.00%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -127.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
118.07%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -16.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -12.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
366.27%
Some acquisitions while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
9.25%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -38.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
3.46%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -11.10%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3.17%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. TSM's 2328.43%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
46.97%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -15.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-378.93%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 578.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-504.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.