PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 15.19%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.03%
D&A growth well above TSM's 1.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.28%
Deferred tax of 85.28% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
1.53%
SBC growth while TSM is negative at -28.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
37.10%
Less working capital growth vs. TSM's 107.08%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-35.96%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-10.31%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-39.05%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
112.91%
Growth well above TSM's 103.79%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-37100.00%
Negative yoy while TSM is 235.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
56.83%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 50.37%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
8.63%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -68.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -42.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-38.37%
We reduce yoy sales while TSM is 66.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
74.14%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. TSM's 353.52%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-92.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -38.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of TSM's 145.07%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.15%
Buyback growth of 30.15% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.