PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.13%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -3.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.94%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1921.79%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.71%
SBC growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
148.52%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-40.00%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-14.71%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-107.83%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
1868.39%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1338.38%
Well above TSM's 270.57%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
33.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.87%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-45.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 8.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.46%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
133.18%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-4576.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -14.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
6.81%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 13.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-191.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.