PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.54%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -3.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.61%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-7.74%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.05%
SBC growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-299.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
25.32%
AR growth of 25.32% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-39.17%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
3840.91%
AP growth of 3840.91% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-97.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-107.38%
Negative yoy while TSM is 270.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-5.58%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-164.77%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 8.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-612.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
39.14%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-1.06%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
94.44%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -14.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
44.07%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 13.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
We have some buyback growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.