PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.32%
Net income growth near Semiconductors median of 14.32%. Charlie Munger would view it as typical for the industry’s current cycle.
-13.07%
D&A shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
99.71%
Deferred tax growth of 99.71% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-142.86%
SBC declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-76.34%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is -83.12%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
90.15%
AR growth of 90.15% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
56.90%
Inventory growth of 56.90% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-116.69%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
138.39%
Some yoy usage while Semiconductors median is negative at -35.70%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
-77.09%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Semiconductors median is -10.04%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
2.58%
Positive CFO growth while Semiconductors median is negative at -26.44%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
74.85%
CapEx growth of 74.85% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-106.21%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
27.20%
Purchases growth of 27.20% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
226.86%
Proceeds growth of 226.86% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-8060.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
44.85%
Under 50% of Semiconductors median of 10.60% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.47%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.