PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.69%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 2.34%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
9.66%
D&A growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 1.20%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
58.56%
Under 50% of Semiconductors median of 46.34% or exceeding it in the negative sense. Jim Chanos would suspect a bigger working capital drain if growth is not justified by sales.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
21.54%
Inventory growth of 21.54% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-35.01%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 3.78%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-47.14%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-98.63%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 28.91%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-31.33%
CapEx declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-35.44%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
2886.21%
Growth of 2886.21% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
20.16%
Investing flow of 20.16% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.29%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.