PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.30%
Net income growth at 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 27.61%. John Neff would advise further margin or cost improvements to match peers.
22.89%
D&A growth of 22.89% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-706.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-151.09%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is -5.12%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
139.32%
Growth of 139.32% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
89.29%
Growth of 89.29% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-53.46%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 23.30%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-158.95%
CapEx declines yoy while Semiconductors median is -50.80%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.00%
Purchases growth of 34.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
15.17%
Proceeds growth of 15.17% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.48%
Slight expansions while Semiconductors median is negative at -3.99%. Peter Lynch wonders if peers are more cautious or have fewer investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.43%
We have some issuance while Semiconductors median is negative at -2.02%. Peter Lynch wonders if peers are controlling share counts more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.