PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.80%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 1.80%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.74%
D&A growth of 0.74% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
99.93%
Deferred tax growth of 99.93% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-99.93%
SBC declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-75.77%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
65.49%
Inventory growth of 65.49% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-203.16%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
177.25%
Under 50% of Semiconductors median of 30.63% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-66.26%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
2.69%
CapEx growth of 2.69% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
27.78%
Purchases growth of 27.78% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
218.65%
Proceeds growth of 218.65% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
90.46%
Investing flow of 90.46% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-149.96%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.