176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-168.40%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 18.54%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
11.96%
D&A growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 0.22%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
-182.21%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
213.49%
Working capital of 213.49% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-100.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
80.39%
Inventory growth of 80.39% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
708.31%
Growth of 708.31% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
570.31%
Growth of 570.31% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-44.26%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 17.30%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
73.53%
CapEx growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 7.33% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-34.32%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-51.50%
We liquidate less yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
314.53%
Growth of 314.53% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-811.88%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.73%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.