PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-339.14%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 34.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-2.53%
D&A shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.63%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-524.40%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.21%
Working capital of 155.21% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.81%
A moderate inventory rise while Semiconductors is negative at -1.66%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
403.71%
Growth of 403.71% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
10.77%
Growth of 10.77% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-146.15%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 20.02%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
60.58%
We have some CapEx expansion while Semiconductors median is negative at -15.85%. Peter Lynch would see peers possibly pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.75%
Purchases growth of 65.75% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-70.22%
We liquidate less yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-664.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-12.36%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is -12.36%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.51%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.