PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.97%
Positive net income growth while Semiconductors median is negative at -3.08%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-1.60%
D&A shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
211.24%
Deferred tax growth of 211.24% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2.26%
SBC growth of 2.26% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-70.14%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is -46.37%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-773.73%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-7.05%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is -0.09%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-26.15%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
71.54%
Growth of 71.54% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
170.05%
Under 50% of Semiconductors median of 0.86% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-107.79%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is -20.97%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
24.34%
CapEx growth of 24.34% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.71%
Purchases growth of 41.71% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
45.70%
Proceeds growth of 45.70% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.79%
Investing flow of 79.79% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-173.79%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
37.58%
Issuance growth of 37.58% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.