PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.91%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.62%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
5.00%
D&A growth of 5.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-24.59%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
0.38%
SBC growth of 0.38% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-181.26%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-314.91%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
89.50%
A moderate inventory rise while Semiconductors is negative at -24.12%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
26.52%
AP growth of 26.52% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-174.24%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-160.65%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Semiconductors median is -7.97%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-102.24%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is -2.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
35.99%
CapEx growth of 35.99% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-27.11%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
42.29%
Proceeds growth of 42.29% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-28.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-2.00%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
95.20%
Debt repayment growth of 95.20% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
92.91%
Issuance growth of 92.91% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.