PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.62%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -20.10%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.08%
D&A growth of 0.08% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
36.67%
Deferred tax growth of 36.67% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
5.96%
SBC growth of 5.96% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-115.82%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is -40.87%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-79.87%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
159.91%
Inventory growth of 159.91% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-82.45%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-110.75%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is -50.53%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-19.77%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Semiconductors median is 8.87%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-44.44%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is -16.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
3.37%
CapEx growth of 3.37% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.21%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
136.96%
Proceeds growth of 136.96% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
99.65%
Growth of 99.65% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
26.14%
Investing flow of 26.14% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-32.10%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-1372.22%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.