PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.79%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
4.20%
D&A growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 0.75%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
88.65%
Deferred tax growth of 88.65% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
20.22%
SBC growth of 20.22% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-539.35%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
34.99%
AR growth of 34.99% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
4.07%
Inventory growth of 4.07% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-6.70%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-841.00%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-152.63%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Semiconductors median is -11.98%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-43.36%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 2.66%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-20.77%
CapEx declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-3960.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-41.10%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
12.58%
Proceeds growth of 12.58% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-440.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-75.21%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
79.78%
Debt repayment growth of 79.78% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
7350.00%
Issuance growth of 7350.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-19.95%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.