PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.12%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -16.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
8.09%
D&A expands slightly while Semiconductors is negative at -0.56%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
-140.89%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
4.90%
SBC growth of 4.90% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-143.00%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-13.87%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-49.73%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
39.34%
AP growth of 39.34% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-373.04%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
1782.43%
A moderate rise while Semiconductors median is negative at -20.68%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-42.93%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is -11.94%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-32.23%
CapEx declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
40.00%
Acquisition growth of 40.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
54.81%
Purchases growth of 54.81% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-7.28%
We liquidate less yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-250.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
264.59%
Investing flow of 264.59% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
97.82%
Debt repayment growth of 97.82% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-220.90%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.