PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.33%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 12.96%. Mohnish Pabrai would find it notably strong if sustainable.
10.39%
D&A growth of 10.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
64.51%
Deferred tax growth of 64.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
8.59%
A slight rise while Technology median is negative at -1.04%. Peter Lynch would check if peers are cutting back more aggressively on equity-based pay.
149.76%
Under 50% of Technology median of 74.32% or exceeding it in the negative sense. Jim Chanos would suspect a bigger working capital drain if growth is not justified by sales.
-101.53%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-21.67%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
105.22%
Under 50% of Technology median of 23.07% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential liquidity warnings or overly aggressive use of trade credit.
4124.14%
Under 50% of Technology median of 19.97% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would sense potential red flags or large tie-ups in these rarely monitored accounts.
-975.44%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -26.54%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
21.67%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of Technology median of 39.20%. Guy Spier would suspect partial underperformance in core liquidity generation.
16.79%
CapEx growth of 16.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
46.76%
Acquisition growth of 46.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
0.89%
Purchases growth of 0.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-58.34%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
302.72%
Growth of 302.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-36.49%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.63%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.