176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.26%
Net income growth of 50.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-2.99%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1314.75%
Working capital of 1314.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.58%
Inventory growth of 86.58% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
315.78%
Growth of 315.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
2945.57%
Growth of 2945.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
168.00%
CFO growth of 168.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-74.11%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-215.36%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
77.43%
Proceeds growth of 77.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-25.27%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-136.65%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.84%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-25.00%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.