PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
53.51%
Net income growth of 53.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
37.00%
D&A growth of 37.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
716.37%
Deferred tax growth of 716.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
495026.74%
SBC growth of 495026.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-132.48%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
266.15%
Inventory growth of 266.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.01%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
100.35%
Growth of 100.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-20.37%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-162.95%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-3043200.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-108.63%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
53.13%
Proceeds growth of 53.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10342.61%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.55%
Issuance growth of 27.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.