PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.11%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-8.63%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-331.25%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-59.60%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
336.79%
Working capital of 336.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
143.06%
AR growth of 143.06% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
8.02%
Inventory growth of 8.02% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
188.76%
AP growth of 188.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
59.50%
Growth of 59.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-19.83%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
33.03%
CFO growth of 33.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
50.29%
CapEx growth of 50.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-542.02%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
167.39%
Proceeds growth of 167.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
75.51%
Investing flow of 75.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.72%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-25.00%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.