PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-36.35%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
5.42%
D&A expands slightly while Technology is negative at -0.51%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
38.10%
Deferred tax growth of 38.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
41.63%
SBC growth of 41.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
123.12%
Working capital of 123.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-95.75%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
1839.83%
Inventory growth of 1839.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
103.38%
AP growth of 103.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-214.54%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-110.28%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
816.19%
CFO growth of 816.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
51.65%
CapEx growth of 51.65% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-162.41%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
137.66%
Proceeds growth of 137.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
71.60%
Investing flow of 71.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
481.78%
Issuance growth of 481.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.