PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.22%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
2.96%
D&A growth of 2.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
440.14%
Deferred tax growth of 440.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
25.11%
SBC growth of 25.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-118.55%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-88.57%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-207.86%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
212.15%
AP growth of 212.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-136.03%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
40.14%
Growth of 40.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-60.38%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -0.96%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-46.16%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.71%
Purchases growth of 18.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-13.40%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
24.46%
Growth of 24.46% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
18.35%
Investing flow of 18.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
59.77%
Debt repayment growth of 59.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
16.60%
Issuance growth of 16.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.