PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.62%
Net income growth of 17.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
0.44%
D&A growth of 0.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-150.06%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-7.56%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
106.64%
Working capital of 106.64% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
176.86%
AR growth of 176.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
26.97%
Inventory growth of 26.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
128.31%
AP growth of 128.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-31.20%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-758.45%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
197.99%
CFO growth of 197.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-67.37%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-115.88%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-5.65%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-5.83%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-20.58%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
30.90%
Issuance growth of 30.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.