PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
96.98%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
3.13%
D&A growth of 3.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
179.92%
Deferred tax growth of 179.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-9.32%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
78.55%
Working capital of 78.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
55.09%
AR growth of 55.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-1937.56%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-4.14%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
110.36%
Growth of 110.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
644.85%
Growth of 644.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
2281.65%
CFO growth of 2281.65% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-114.17%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.77%
Purchases growth of 46.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-19.08%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-237.96%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
74.72%
Investing flow of 74.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
3.69%
Debt repayment growth of 3.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.