PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.82%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
3.51%
D&A growth of 3.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
180.05%
Deferred tax growth of 180.05% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-3.00%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-828.21%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-165.64%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-116.35%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
131.35%
AP growth of 131.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
61.98%
Growth of 61.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
34.51%
Growth of 34.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-45.08%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-29.42%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.25%
Purchases growth of 27.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
214.86%
Proceeds growth of 214.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
55052.00%
Growth of 55052.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
408.43%
Investing flow of 408.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-2.95%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-650.00%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.