PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.11%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
1.43%
D&A growth of 1.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
247.68%
Deferred tax growth of 247.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
5.88%
SBC growth of 5.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
37.81%
Working capital of 37.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
58.62%
AR growth of 58.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
62.52%
Inventory growth of 62.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-111.56%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
24.60%
Growth of 24.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-17.20%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
68.26%
CFO growth of 68.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
55.10%
CapEx growth of 55.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.83%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-70.35%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-100.13%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-126.32%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-3.04%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.