PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.74%
Net income growth of 23.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-12.58%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-11.84%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
5.55%
SBC growth of 5.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
359.79%
Working capital of 359.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
171.43%
AR growth of 171.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-195.87%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
1035.24%
AP growth of 1035.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
594.86%
Growth of 594.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
213.68%
Growth of 213.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
146.87%
CFO growth of 146.87% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-73.94%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
244.54%
Acquisition growth of 244.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-239.68%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
66.89%
Proceeds growth of 66.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-150.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-486.85%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
63.99%
Debt repayment growth of 63.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.