PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.26%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.95%
D&A growth of 0.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-21.50%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
8.15%
SBC growth of 8.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-72.18%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-362.93%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
208.95%
Inventory growth of 208.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-227.74%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
59.55%
Growth of 59.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
296.91%
Growth of 296.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-36.25%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
22.50%
CapEx growth of 22.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.89%
Purchases growth of 31.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-5.50%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-101.20%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
80.94%
Investing flow of 80.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-0.71%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.