PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.77%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.98%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-2.17%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
22.22%
Deferred tax growth of 22.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-10.17%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-111.46%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-154.84%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
228.57%
Inventory growth of 228.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
277.78%
AP growth of 277.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-140.88%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-14.29%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-39.53%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-266.67%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.96%
Purchases growth of 41.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
14.47%
Proceeds growth of 14.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
20.00%
Growth of 20.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
182.63%
Investing flow of 182.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
66.67%
Debt repayment growth of 66.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-270.37%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.