PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
122.53%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
2.13%
D&A growth of 2.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
75.61%
Deferred tax growth of 75.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
12.07%
SBC growth of 12.07% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-63.77%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-57.02%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-23.62%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-12.12%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-36.21%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
712.50%
Growth of 712.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
148.91%
CFO growth of 148.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-18.75%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Purchases growth of 11.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-22.62%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-83.33%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-21.56%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-44400.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.22%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.