PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
33.69%
Net income growth of 33.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
10.20%
D&A growth of 10.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-1302.33%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
17.76%
SBC growth of 17.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
396.52%
Working capital of 396.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-317.78%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
274.29%
Inventory growth of 274.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-30.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
3533.33%
Growth of 3533.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-16.67%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
17.37%
CFO growth of 17.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-502.90%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.59%
Proceeds growth of 9.59% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-99.44%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-108.39%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
85.48%
Debt repayment growth of 85.48% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.82%
Buyback growth of 76.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.