PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.17%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -10.58%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
5.56%
D&A growth of 5.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
109.86%
Deferred tax growth of 109.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2.38%
SBC growth of 2.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-104.90%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
157.14%
AR growth of 157.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-103.28%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-65.08%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-119.08%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-260.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -11.25%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
6.41%
CFO growth of 6.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
71.63%
CapEx growth of 71.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-36950.00%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-32.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-171750.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-14695.83%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
77.78%
Debt repayment growth of 77.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-1771.43%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.